Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Hampton v. Otero County Hospital Association
as 2:2023cv00470
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel R Hampton
Defendant:
Otero County Hospital Association doing business as Gerald Champion Regional Medical Center and Otero County Hospital Association, Inc. doing business as Gerald Champion Regional Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00655
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Lucero v. Autosales Incorporated, et al.
as 1:2012cv01320
Defendant:
Genuine Parts Company, Schaeffler Group USA, Inc., NMBFIL, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Marie Lucero, Jacquelyn MacErnie, Fawn Maestas and others
Not Yet Classified:
Feliz A. Rael
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pacely v. Lockett
as 2:2012cv00152
Plaintiff:
Vincent Pacely
Defendant:
Mark Lockett and Gerald Champion Regional Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Berry v. Bryant et al
as 1:2011cv00514
Plaintiff:
Ann Berry
Defendant:
Frank T. Bryant , Christian R. Schlicht, Otero County Hospital Association and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Griffin v. Gerald Champion Regional Medical Center et al
as 1:2009cv00318
Plaintiff:
Terrance D Griffin
Defendant:
Gerald Champion Regional Medical Center, Gary D Siebel, Melissa Salinas and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Lusk et al v. Sanchez et al
as 1:2008cv00182
Plaintiff:
Sam Lusk, Samantha Lusk, Billye Lusk and others
Defendant:
Eugene Sanchez and Champion Auto Carriers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Lusk et al v. Sanchez et al
as 6:2008cv00182
Plaintiff:
Sam Gordon Lusk, Sam Gordon Lusk, Sam Gordon Lusk and others
Defendant:
Eugene Sanchez, Eugene Sanchez, Champion Auto Carriers, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
