Cases 1 - 10 of 128
Britt v. Durham et al
as 1:2024cv00118
Defendant:
Chandler Durham, Turbo the Great, Warner-Chappell Music, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jamal Britt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Chandler v. United States Postal Service
as 1:2023cv05579
Plaintiff:
Shanita Chandler
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Sutton v. Flora et al
as 1:2023mi00112
Plaintiff:
Katrina N. Sutton
Defendant:
Judge Amanda Flora, ATT. Richard Taylor, Colton Creek Chandler Residential's C.E.O. (s) and others
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 No Cause Specified
Chandler v. Taylor
as 1:2023cv05553
Plaintiff:
Jakale Errion Chandler
Defendant:
Kebo Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chandler v. Taylor
as 1:2023cv05529
Plaintiff:
Jakale Errion Chandler
Defendant:
Kebo Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chandler v. Taylor et al
as 1:2023cv04624
Plaintiff:
Jakale Chandler
Defendant:
Kebo Taylor, Gwinnett County Jail and Gwinnett County City
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04428
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (other)
Chandler v. Irwin County Detention Center
as 1:2023cv04316
Plaintiff:
Jakale Errion Chandler
Defendant:
Irwin County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kendall v. Chandler Residential
as 1:2023cv03965
Plaintiff:
Marshaun Kendall
Defendant:
Chandler Residential
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Drake v. Nimms et al
as 3:2023cv00112
Plaintiff:
Christopher Daniel Drake
Defendant:
Wesley Grizzards Nimms, Chandler Chief Zimmermans, Bobby Grimes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
