Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Concord Music Group, Inc. v. X Corp We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00606
Plaintiff: Concord Music Group, Inc., Universal Music Corp. doing business as 360 Music doing business as Universal Music Works, Songs of Universal, Inc. doing business as Universal Music Works doing business as Universal Tunes and others
Defendant: X Corp doing business as Twitter
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101 Copyright Infringement
W Chappell Music Corp. et al v. J & B Concepts, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00337
Plaintiff: W Chappell Music Corp. doing business as WC Music Corp., Herbilicious Music, Lit Up Music and others
Defendant: J & B Concepts, LLC and Jean-Pierre Kossisyan
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504 Copyright Infringement
Chappel & Co Inc et al v. British Bulldog LLC, The et al
as 3:2020cv00928
Defendant: William Quirk, Robert Sharpley, British Bulldog LLC, The and others
Plaintiff: Innocent Criminal, Chappel & Co Inc and Goo Eyed Music
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504
Chappell & Co., Inc. et al v. Proletariat V, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv09950
Plaintiff: Shapiro, Bernstein & Co., Inc., Chappell & Co., Inc. and Anne-Rachel Music Corp.
Defendant: John Barounis and Proletariat V, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Universal Polygram International Publishing Inc et al v. ESP Entertainment LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv01742
Defendant: ESP Entertainment, L.L.C., Peter H. Sikov, Peter H Sikov and others
Plaintiff: Jewel Music Publishing Co., Inc., St. Nicholas Music, Inc., Chappell Co., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
UMG Recordings, Inc. et al v. Bright House Networks, LLC.
as 8:2019cv00710
Plaintiff: EMI Mills Music, Inc., Universal Music Publishing Inc., Universal Music Corp. and others
Defendant: Bright House Networks, LLC.
Respondent: Advance Publications, Inc., Sabin, Bermant, and Gould LLP and Jerry Birenz
3Rd Party Defendant: Charter Communications, Inc., Ronald Hughes, Robert Kuszmar and others
Interested Party: MarkMonitor, Inc.
Not Classified By Court: Judge S. James Otero and Raymond Zink
Counter Defendant: W Chappell Music Corp.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Warner Records Inc et al v. Charter Communications, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv00874
Plaintiff: Stone Diamond Music Corp., Universal Music Publishing Inc., Elektra Entertainment Group Inc. and others
Counter Claimant: EMI Algee Music Corp., Capitol Records, LLC, Warner-Tamerlane Publishing Corp. and others
Counter Defendant: Volcano Entertainment III, LLC, Universal Music Publishing AB, EMI Jemaxal Music Inc. and others
Respondent: MarkMonitor, Inc., Jill Lesser, Recording Industry Association of America, The and others
Amicus Curiae: Amici Curiae Copyright Law Professors
Intervenor: Cox Communications, Inc.
Not Classified By Court: BCS Computers LLC
Special Master: Regina M. Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Chappell-Co., Inc. et al v. Edge Partners, L.L.C. et al
as 8:2019cv00480
Plaintiff: Edwin H Morris & Co., Inc., Music Sales Corp. and Chappell-Co., Inc.
Defendant: Edge Partners, L.L.C. and Edward Fay
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Chappell Co., Inc. et al v. Tony Spavone Ristorante, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv03917
Plaintiff: Chappell Co., Inc. , Warner Bros., Inc. and Universal Polygram International Publishing, Inc.
Defendant: Tony Spavone Ristorante, Inc. and Anthony Spavone
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504
Universal Polygram International Publishing Inc. et al v. North Inn Limited et al
as 1:2017cv00800
Plaintiff: Universal Polygram International Publishing Inc. , Chappell-Co, Inc. , The Royalty Network, Inc. d/b/a Roynet Music and others
Defendant: North Inn Limited and Dean Pappas
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?