Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Johnson v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv10263
Plaintiff:
Charlene Johnson
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant

as 5:2020cv00461
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Johnson v. Saul

as 5:2020cv00143
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Charlene Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Johnson v. Advanced Air Solutions Inc. et al

as 5:2019cv00613
Defendant:
Castle Credit Co Holdings LLC and Advanced Air Solutions Inc.
Plaintiff:
Charlene Johnson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
JOHNSON v. ASTRAZENECA LP et al
as 2:2019cv00797
Defendant:
MERCK & CO. INC. D/B/A MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION, ASTRAZENECA LP and ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP
Plaintiff:
FRANCES JOHNSON and FRANCES CHARLENE JOHNSON
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson et al v. City of Yorkville et al
as 1:2018cv05946
Defendant:
Officer Jeffrey Johnson, Sgt. Klingel and City of Yorkville
Plaintiff:
Charlene Johnson and Tad Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roy Samuels v. Anthony Dayton et al

as 2:2018cv01824
Defendant:
Anthony Dayton, Does and Charlene Johnson
Plaintiff:
Roy Samuels
Jacks v. Normand et al

as 2:2017cv06328
Plaintiff:
Howard Junior Jacks
Defendant:
Newell Normand, Chief Munfra, Doctor Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fischer v. Kuang-Wu Lo et al
as 2:2017cv05270
Plaintiff:
Richard Fischer
Defendant:
William Kuang-Wu Lo , Walter T Smith, Correcthealth Jefferson, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nailer v. Normand et al
as 2:2017cv02362
Plaintiff:
Danielle Nailer
Defendant:
Newell Normand , Kyle Flettrich , James Dibble and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.