Cases 1 - 10 of 878
Engelson v. Bean et al

as 2:2025cv00143
Plaintiff:
Cole D. Engelson
Defendant:
Jeremy Bean, Brian Williams, Calvin Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Lozano
as 25-50018
Petitioner:
Fernando Lozano
Respondent:
Charles Daniels, Warden, USP Beaumont
Smith v. Baca, et al.
as 24-7816
Defendant:
STEVE DANIELS, Substituted in for NDOC Director Doe (ECF No. 16) agent of Charles Daniels, CHARLES DANIELS, NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Caseworker: Substituted by Edward Gibson (ECF No. 16) and others
Plaintiff:
JACOB SMITH
Harris v. Sisolak, et al.
as 24-7594
Defendant:
STEVEN SISOLAK, WILLIAM GITTERE, BARBARA CEGAVSKE and others
Plaintiff:
AMMAR HARRIS
Reed v. Chambers, et al.
as 24-7406
Defendant:
TERRY REYNOLDS, Director of Business & Industry Office of the Labor Commissioner; #12, DWAUNE WILSON, #12, BRIAN WILLIAMS, #12 and others
Plaintiff:
MAX REED, II, #12
Mitchell v. Daniel
as 4:2024cv04782
Respondent:
Charles Daniel
Petitioner:
Devin Damon Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pruett v. Daniels
as 3:2024cv00533
Plaintiff:
Jordan Jeffrey Pruett
Defendant:
Charles Daniels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Unknown Plaintiff v. Torres et al
as 1:2024cv08715
Defendant:
Ken Legall, JOHN/JANE 1-10 DOE(S), James Saunders and others
Pretrial Service:
City of New York
Plaintiff:
Unknown Plaintiff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 pr Fed. Question: Federal Prisoner Civil Rights
Beard v. Torres et al
as 1:2024cv08717
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Beard
Defendant:
Ronald Brereton, Christopher Jackson, Jr., Achim Huggins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Hager, et al.
as 24-6836
Defendant:
LARRY HALL, CHARLES DANIELS, ERIC LOPEZ and others
Plaintiff:
TONEY A. WHITE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.