Cases 1 - 10 of 327
Roberts v. USA
as 3:2025cv00008
Plaintiff:
Charles Roberts, Jr.
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Smith v. The Federal Bureau of Investigations
as 1:2025cv00012
Plaintiff:
Charles Robert Smith
Defendant:
The Federal Bureau of Investigations
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act - Right of Review
Smith
as 1:2025cv00009
Plaintiff:
Charles Robert Smith
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedures Act
Schmidt v. Ford Motor Co.
as 2:2024cv03796
Plaintiff:
Charles Robert Schmidt
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
State of Maryland v. Smith et al
as 1:2024cv03699
Plaintiff:
State of Maryland
Defendant:
Charles Robert Smith
Petitioner:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal - Suit against Federal Officer
Williams v. Becton Dickinson and Company et al
as 2:2024cv03158
Plaintiff:
Charles Robert Williams
Defendant:
Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated, Becton Dickinson and Company, Bard Access Systems Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bolt et al v. Turn Key Health Clinics, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv02679
Defendant:
Shonda High, Kaela Seeburger, Turn Key Health Clinics, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Dylan Bolt and Chris Borkovec
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (d) - Civil Rights (Death)
Frickey v. Nelson et al
as 2:2024cv02212
Defendant:
Miller IT Consulting, LLC, Ryan M Nelson, Daniel Edwards and others
Plaintiff:
Vanessa Frickey
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Stout v. Smith International
as 24-30571
Defendant:
Smith International, Incorporated and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Charles Robert Stout
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-12648
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
