Cases 1 - 10 of 406
JONES v. NEW KENSINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2024cv00583
Plaintiff:
CHARLES DARNELL JONES
Defendant:
NEW KENSINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, BEN R. MICHAELS and JERRY M. HOBECK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01325
Plaintiff:
Charles R. Jones
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
JONES v. UNITED STATES
as 1:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
CHARLES ANTHONY JONES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
JONES v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2024cv00470
Petitioner:
CHARLES D. JONES
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, NICOLE W. ZICCARELLI and STEVEN PELESKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Charles Jones, Sr. v. Dexter Payne
as 24-1434
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Jones, Sr.
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Jones v. Kroger Texas L.P.
as 4:2024cv00423
Plaintiff:
Charles Ray Jones
Defendant:
Kroger Texas L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Charles Jones v. United States
as 24-1137
Petitioner:
Charles J. Jones
Respondent:
United States of America
Diane Owens, et al v. FirstEnergy Corporation, et al
as 23-3945
Not Classified By Court:
In re: FIRSTENERGY CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DIANE OWENS, CHANA FRAND, CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM and others
Defendant:
FIRSTENERGY CORPORATION
Defendant / Appellant:
CHARLES E. JONES
Jones v. Records et al
as 1:2023cv01320
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Jones, III
Defendant:
Bureau Chief Mike Records, Matthew Dutton, Thelma Charles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Budnik et al
as 2:2023cv00207
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Jones, Sr
Defendant:
Christopher Budnik, William Freeman, Thomas Rolland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
