Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Okereke v. Massachusetts College of Phar
as 20-402
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, T.S. Ellis, III, in his Official Capacity as United States District Court Judge, Eastern District of Virginia, United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Precious Okereke
Heard et al v. Deal et al
as 2:2014cv00179
Plaintiff:
Robert Heard
Defendant:
Nathan Deal, Doug Collins, G.B.I. Director and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heard et al v. Collins et al
as 2:2014cv00111
Plaintiff:
Robert Heard
Defendant:
Doug Collins, Nathan Deal, Casey Cagle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heard v. O'Kelly et al
as 1:2013cv02105
Plaintiff:
Robert Heard
Defendant:
William C. O'Kelly, C. Ashley Royal, E. Clayton Scofield and others
HEARD v. FIELDS et al
as 5:2012cv00029
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HEARD
Defendant:
RAMACHANDRA R PAIDI, CHARLES PANNELL, JR, CHARLES A MOYE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heard v. Pannell et al
as 1:2011cv04280
Plaintiff:
Robert Heard
Defendant:
Charles A. Pannell, Jr., E. Clayton Scofield, III, Sonny Perdue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heard v. Pannell et al
as 1:2011cv04021
Plaintiff:
Robert Heard
Defendant:
Charles A. Pannell, Jr., E. Clayton Scofield, III, B. Avant Edenfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heard v. Edenfield et al
as 1:2011cv02828
Plaintiff:
Robert Heard
Defendant:
B. Avant Edenfield, C. R. Smith., Marc T. Treadwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heard v. McIntyre et al
as 2:2011cv00157
Plaintiff:
Robert Heard
Defendant:
Marcia McIntyre, Sharin Caskin, A. Toby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heard v. Lowes et al
as 1:2011cv00318
Plaintiff:
Robert Heard
Defendant:
Laura L. Lowes, Sonny Perdue, Thurbert Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
