Cases 1 - 10 of 15
ANDERSON JR. et al v. MCGILL et al
as 2:2023cv20535
Plaintiff:
CHARLES B. ANDERSON JR., JOSE N.M.I. VALENTINE, ISAAC JERDAN and others
Defendant:
PATRICIA MCGILL, MR. SIMS, M. BRANTLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDERSON v. NOGAN et al
as 2:2021cv08355
Defendant:
DIRECTOR, BRANTLEY and ASST. SUPT. NOGAN
Plaintiff:
CHARLES B ANDERSON, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANDERSON v. NOGAN et al
as 1:2021cv00519
Defendant:
NOGAN, DIRECTOR and BRANTLEY
Plaintiff:
CHARLES B. ANDERSON, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Reynolds et al
as 4:2020cv00414
Plaintiff:
Charles B Anderson and Charles B. Anderson
Defendant:
Kim Reynolds, Linda Koechle, Beth Skinner and others
Interested Party:
William A. Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANDERSON v. OFC J. SALERNO et al
as 2:2019cv19926
Defendant:
OFC WONG, RRM F.B.O.P. PATRICK MCFARLAND, LT. EICHENRACH and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES B ANDERSON, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Falsted et al
as 5:2016cv01060
Plaintiff:
Charles B Anderson, Jr
Defendant:
FNU Falsted and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Charles Anderson, Jr. v. FCC Coleman - USP II Warden
as 15-13654
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES B. ANDERSON, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
FCC COLEMAN - USP II WARDEN
Anderson v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II
as 5:2013cv00155
Petitioner:
Charles B. Anderson, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Anderson v. Dormire et al
as 1:2012cv00199
Plaintiff:
Charles B. Anderson
Defendant:
Dave Dormire, Dwayne Kempker, Ian Wallace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Strange et al
as 1:2010cv00149
Plaintiff:
Charles B. Anderson
Defendant:
William Strange, J. Braul, Kirk Pueppke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
