Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 19-16037
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00514
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754
Scott Allen Perry et al v. Mediocre Films, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv08779
Defendant:
Gregory Charles Benson, Does and Mediocre Films, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Joshua David Perry and Scott Allen Perry
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv04569
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Michael Ogden v. County of Maui, et al
as 08-16317
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL DAVID OGDEN, as Special Administrator of the Estate of Charles Benson Ogden
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF MAUI, JOHN LUCIA and CLIFFORD PACHECO
Benson v. Chunghwa Picture Tubes, LTD. et al
as 3:2008cv01985
Plaintiff:
Charles Benson
Defendant:
Chunghwa Picture Tubes, LTD., Tatung Company of America, Inc., L.G. Electronics, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MDL No. 1917 In Re: Cathode Ray Tube (CRT) Antitrust Litigation
as 4:2007cv05944
Plaintiff:
ABC Appliance, Inc., Janet Ackerman, James E. Allee and others
Defendant:
Technicolor S.A, Beijing Matsushita Color Crt Company, LTD., Beijing-Matsushita Color CRT Company, Ltd. and others
Respondent:
Alan Frankel
Interested Party:
Wettstein & Sons, Inc, Mitsubishi Digital Electronics Americas, Inc., Mitsubishi Electric & Electronics USA, Inc. and others
Intervenor:
State of Illinois, U.S. Department of Justice, Antitrust Division and State of Oregon
Other:
Douglas W. St. John, Donnie Clifton, Harry Garavanian and others
Not Yet Classified:
State of Connecticut, YRC, INC., Douglas A. Kelley and others
Special Master:
James Larson, Honorable Vaughn R. Walker, Honorable Charles A. Legge and others
Petitioner:
Jonathan Rich
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
