Cases 1 - 7 of 7
COFFMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv42423
Plaintiff:
THOMAS CHARLES COFFMAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coffman et al v. Wyndham Destinations, Inc. et al
as 6:2019cv01558
Defendant:
Wyndham Vacation Ownership, Inc., Wyndham Destinations, Inc. and Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Brenda Coffman and Charles Coffman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coffman et al v. Yeakel, M.D. et al
as 1:2017cv01472
Plaintiff:
Ethel Coffman and Charles Coffman
Defendant:
Joseph Yeakel and Alexander Serra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coffman et al v. Virtual Radiologic Corporation
as 0:2017cv02081
Plaintiff:
Ethel Coffman and Charles Coffman
Defendant:
Virtual Radiologic Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Board of Trustees of the National Roofing Industry Pension Fund et al v. Technicoat Management, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv01130
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of the National Roofers Union Health and Welfare Fund, Board of Trustees of the National Roofing Industry Pension Fund and Board of Trustees of the Roofers and Waterproofers Research and Education Trust Fund
Defendant:
Robert Charles Coffman and Technicoat Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Boevers, et al v. Coffman, et al
as 16-6039
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CINDY BOEVERS, an individual and RETA STRUBHAR, an individual
Defendant - Appellant:
CHARLES COFFMAN, in his official and individual capacity, AL GLEICHMANN, in his official and individual capacity and DONNIE ROBINSON, in his official and individual capacity
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PIEDMONT, OKLAHOMA, a municipal corporation
Boevers et al v. Piedmont City of et al
as 5:2014cv01048
Plaintiff:
Cindy Boevers and Reta Strubhar
Defendant:
Piedmont City of , Charles Coffman , Al Gleichmann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
