Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Newton et al v. Transport Corporation of America Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv00101
Plaintiff:
Sabrina Newton , G. N. , T. N. and others
Defendant:
Transport Corporation of America Inc. and Charles D. Henderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Charles D Henderson v. Carolyn W. Colvin
as 8:2014cv00870
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Plaintiff:
Charles D Henderson
Henderson v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2013cv00042
Plaintiff:
Charles D. Henderson, Jr.
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
General Electric Capital Corporation v. Henderson et al
as 3:2013cv00140
Plaintiff:
General Electric Capital Corporation
Defendant:
Charles D Henderson and Patsy Lee Henderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Federal Insurance Company v. C.D. Henderson, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00982
Plaintiff:
Federal Insurance Company and Federal Insurance Company
Defendant:
C.D. Henderson, Inc., C.D. Henderson Construction, Inc., Northwest Construction Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Cellco Partnership v. Passport Holidays, LLC et al
as 6:2007mc00054
Plaintiff:
Cellco Partnership
Defendant:
Passport Holidays, LLC, Specialized Programming and Marketting, LLC, Charles D. Henderson and others
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
GC NOTE LLC v. NAP GRAND CAYMAN PARTNER LTD et al
as 5:2007cv00013
Defendant:
NAP GRAND CAYMAN PARTNER LTD, NAP GRAND CAYMAN PARTNER LTD, BRADFORD B BECK and others
Plaintiff:
GC NOTE LLC and GC NOTE LLC
Receiver:
ROBERT BARNARD
ThirdParty Defendant:
NDF/TRA Grand Cayman, L.P.
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
NAP GRAND CAYMAN PARTNER LTD
Cross Claimant:
NAP GRAND CAYMAN PARTNER LTD
Cross Defendant:
NDF/TRA Grand Cayman, L.P.
Counter Claimant:
NAP GRAND CAYMAN PARTNER LTD
Counter Defendant:
NDF/TRA Grand Cayman, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
