Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Universal Truck & Equipment Co, et al v. Southworth-Milton, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-1609
Plaintiff - Appellant: UNIVERSAL TRUCK & EQUIPMENT COMPANY, INC., NEW LONDON MINING, MANUFACTURING & PROCESSING, LLC, NICHOLAS E. CAMBIO, individually and as Trustee of the Nicholas E. Cambio, Roney A. Malafronte and Vincent A. Cambio Trust and others
Defendant - Appellee: SOUTHWORTH-MILTON, INC.
Defendant: W. FRANK BLOUNI, JOHN R. BRAZIL, DANIEL M. DICKINSON and others
The Ellen J. Stokar IRA v. Oberhelman et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv01509
Defendant: Peter A. Magowan, Joshua I. Smith, Eugene V. Fife and others
Interested Party: Michael D. Wolin, Derivatively on Behalf of Caterpillar, Inc., Iron Workers Mid-South Pension Fund and City of Sterling Heights General Employees' Retirement System
Plaintiff: The Ellen J. Stokar IRA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Universal Truck & Equipment Co, et al v. Southworth-Milton, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-2070
Plaintiff - Appellant: UNIVERSAL TRUCK & EQUIPMENT COMPANY, INC., NEW LONDON MINING, MANUFACTURING & PROCESSING, LLC, NICHOLAS E. CAMBIO, individually and as Trustee of the Nicholas E. Cambio, Roney A. Malafronte and Vincent A. Cambio Trust and others
Defendant - Appellee: CATERPILLAR, INC., CATERPILLAR FINANCE SERVICE CORPORATION and SOUTHWORTH-MILTON, INC.
Defendant: W. FRANK BLOUNI, JOHN R. BRAZIL, DANIEL M. DICKINSON and others
Michael D. Wolin, Derivatively on Behalf of CATERPILLAR, INC. v. Oberhelman et al
as 1:2013cv05561
Defendant: Peter A. Magowan, Joshua I. Smith, Daniel M. Dickinson and others
Plaintiff: Michael D. Wolin, Derivatively on Behalf of CATERPILLAR, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wolin, Derivatively on Behalf of Caterpillar, Inc. v. Oberhelman et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv01344
Defendant: Peter A. Magowan, Joshua I. Smith, Daniel M. Dickinson and others
Plaintiff: Michael D. Wolin, Derivatively on Behalf of Caterpillar, Inc.
Interested Party: The Ellen J. Stokar IRA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
City of Sterling Heights General Employees' Retirement System v. Oberhelman et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv01141
Defendant: Peter A. Magowan, Daniel M. Dickinson, Jon M. Huntsman, Jr. and others
Interested Party: The Ellen J. Stokar IRA
Plaintiff: City of Sterling Heights General Employees' Retirement System
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Iron Workers Mid-South Pension Fund v. Oberhelman et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv01104
Defendant: Eugene V. Fife, Issek FUCHS, David R. Goode and others
Interested Party: Robert LOWINGER
Plaintiff: The Ellen J. Stokar IRA, Iron Workers Mid-South Pension Fund, Michael D. Wolin, Derivatively on Behalf of Caterpillar, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In Re: Caterpiller Inc. Derivative Litigation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv01076
Defendant: William A Osborn, Eugene V. Fife, Stuart L. Levenick and others
Plaintiff: Asbestos Workers Philadelphia Pension Fund and City of Lansing Police and Fire Retirement System
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Asbestos Workers Philadelphia Pension Fund v. Calhoun et al
as 1:2012cv01077
Defendant: William A Osborn, Eugene V. Fife, David R. Goode and others
Plaintiff: Asbestos Workers Philadelphia Pension Fund
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Universal Truck & Equipment Company, Inc. et al v. Caterpillar, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv00466
Defendant: Eugene V. Fife, John T. Dillon, David R. Goode and others
Plaintiff: New London Mining, Manufacturing & Processing, LLC, Universal Truck & Equipment Company, Inc., Nicholas E. Cambio and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?