Cases 1 - 10 of 72
ANDERSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv09499
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES E ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
The Marshall County Coal Company v. Anderson et al
as 5:2016cv00181
Plaintiff:
The Marshall County Coal Company
Defendant:
Margelee Anderson, Charla L. Anderson and Estate of Charles E. Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CHARLES E. ANDERSON, Trustee on behalf of the PAINTERS DISTRICT COUNCIL NO. 30 HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, the PAINTERS DISTRICT COUNCIL NO. 30 PENSION FUND, and the PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES DISTRICT C et al v. CR2 Painting, Ltd. et al
as 1:2014cv05001
Plaintiff:
CHARLES E. ANDERSON, Trustee on behalf of the PAINTERS DISTRICT COUNCIL NO. 30 HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, the PAINTERS DISTRICT COUNCIL NO. 30 PENSION FUND, and the PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES DISTRICT C and WILLIAM NIELSEN, Trustee on behalf of the NORTHERN ILLINOIS PAINTING AND DRYWALL INSTITUTE; and the PAINTERS DISTRICT COUNCIL NO. 30 OF THE INTERNATIONAL UNION OF PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES, AFL-CIO,
Defendant:
CR2 Painting, Ltd. and CHARLES WILLIAMS a/k/a KURT WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Anderson v. Pleasant
as 3:2013cv03276
Plaintiff:
Charles E Anderson
Defendant:
Terrance Pleasant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson et al v. Ethicon, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv27170
Plaintiff:
Kathy Jones Anderson and Charles E. Anderson
Defendant:
Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CHARLES E. ANDERSON, Trustee on behalf of the PAINTERS DISTRICT COUNCIL NO. 30 HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, the PAINTERS DISTRICT COUNCIL NO. 30 PENSION FUND, and the PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES DISTRICT C et al v. WILLIAM KOKOSOULIS individually
as 1:2013cv06668
Plaintiff:
CHARLES E. ANDERSON, Trustee on behalf of the PAINTERS DISTRICT COUNCIL NO. 30 HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, the PAINTERS DISTRICT COUNCIL NO. 30 PENSION FUND, and the PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES DISTRICT C , WILLIAM NIELSEN, Trustee on behalf of the NORTHERN ILLINOIS PAINTING AND DRYWALL INSTITUTE and PAINTERS DISTRICT COUNCIL NO. 30 OF THE INTERNATIONAL UNION OF PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES, AFL-CIO, a labor organization
Defendant:
WILLIAM KOKOSOULIS individually
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Charles E. Anderson, Trustee on behalf of Painters' District Council No. 30 Pension Fund, Painters' District Council No. 30 Health And Welfare Fund, and Painters' and Allied Trades Dist et al v. Pekin Glass & Mirror Company, Inc., et al
as 1:2013cv05985
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Anderson, Trustee on behalf of Painters' District Council No. 30 Pension Fund, Painters' District Council No. 30 Health And Welfare Fund, and Painters' and Allied Trades Dist and Painters' District Council No. 30, International Union of Painters and Allied Trades, AFL-CIO, a labor organization
Defendant:
Pekin Glass & Mirror Company, Inc.,, Daniel Sullivan and Holly Payne
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Charles E. Anderson et al v. ALCA, Inc.
as 1:2013cv01595
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Anderson , Painters' District Council No. 30 Health and Welfare Fund , Painters' and Allied Trades District Council No. 30 Joint Apprenticeship and Training Fund and others
Defendant:
ALCA, Inc. and David Pasquinelli
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Anderson et al v. WS Painting Co. et al
as 1:2013cv01388
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Anderson , Painters' District Council No. 30 Health and Welfare Fund , Painters and Allied Trades District Council No. 30 Joint Apprenticeship and Training Fund and others
Defendant:
WS Painting Co. and Krzysztof Lenart
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Anderson et al v. Meza
as 1:2012cv09969
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Anderson , Painters' District Council No. 30 Health and Welfare Fund , Painters' District Council No. 30 Pension Fund and others
Defendant:
Manuel Meza
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
