Cases
Jackson v. Black et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv04043
Plaintiff: Timothy Wade Jackson
Defendant: Charles E. Black and Connie Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hurtado v. Gramercy Property Trust et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv02711
Defendant: Morgan Stanley & Co., LLC, Allan J. Baum, JEFFREY E. KELTER and others
Plaintiff: Raul Hurtado
Madry v. Gramercy Property Trust et al
as 1:2018cv01851
Plaintiff: Marek T. Madry
Defendant: Gramercy Property Trust, Allan J. Baum, Jamie Behar and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Franchi v. Gramercy Property Trust et al
as 1:2018cv01842
Plaintiff: Anthony Franchi
Defendant: Gramercy Property Trust, Charles E. Black, Gordon F. Dugan and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Anderson v. Gramercy Property Trust et al
as 1:2018cv05335
Defendant: Gramercy Property Trust, Charles E Black, Gordon F Dugan and others
Plaintiff: Scott Anderson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Black et al v. Kerzner International Holdings Limited et al
as 0:2012cv60301
Plaintiff: Charles E. Black, Jr. and Kristi H. Black
Defendant: Kerzner International Resorts, Inc., Kerzner International North America, Inc., Kerzner International Marketing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barfield et al v. Norfolk Southern Corporation et al
as 1:2008cv00095
Plaintiff: Susie A Barfield, Tommy G Barton, Sr, Charles R Beard and others
Defendant: Norfolk Southern Corporation, Jimmy Thornton and Mike Ford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
BLACK v. VAPOR, A BRUNSWICK COMPANY et al
as 2:2007cv65224
Plaintiff: CHARLES E. BLACK, CHARLES E. BLACK, CHARLES E. BLACK and others
Defendant: VAPOR, A BRUNSWICK COMPANY, OWENS-CORNING, OWENS-CORNING and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?