Cases 1 - 10 of 79
Charles Jones, Sr. v. Dexter Payne
as 24-1434
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Jones, Sr.
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Jones v. Records et al
as 1:2023cv01320
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Jones, III
Defendant:
Bureau Chief Mike Records, Matthew Dutton, Thelma Charles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Budnik et al
as 2:2023cv00207
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Jones, Sr
Defendant:
Christopher Budnik, William Freeman, Thomas Rolland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Charles Jones, Sr. v. Dexter Payne
as 23-2919
Petitioner:
Charles Edward Jones, Sr.
Respondent:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Jones et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv02839
Defendant:
Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc, 3M Company and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Jones, Harold Edward Robertson, Robert Charles Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Product Liability
Jones et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00670
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Jones, Harold Edward Robertson, Robert Charles Robinson and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Charles Jones, Sr. v. Dexter Payne
as 23-2214
Petitioner:
Charles Edward Jones, Sr.
Respondent:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Charles Jones, Sr. v. Dexter Payne
as 23-1062
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Charles Edward Jones, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Charles Jones v. USA, et al
as 22-11709
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES EDWARD JONES
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FNU BROWN, Lieutenant, FNU MILLER, Assistant Warden and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
