Cases 1 - 8 of 8
FAIR v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv13681
Plaintiff:
CHARLES FAIR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lloyd's, London, Certain Underwriters at v. Chastain et al
as 5:2020cv05130
Defendant:
Edward J. Byrnes, Adams Trust UAD September 8, 2004, The, Charles Fair and others
Plaintiff:
Lloyd's, London, Certain Underwriters at
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fair v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2020cv06479
Plaintiff:
David Charles Fair
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Fair v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2018cv06630
Plaintiff:
David Charles Fair
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Fair v. AbbVie Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv09820
Plaintiff:
Charles Fair
Defendant:
AbbVie Inc. and Abbott Laboratories Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fair v. Disability Reinsurance Management Services, Inc.
as 6:2012cv02205
Counter Claimant:
Disability Reinsurance Management Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Disability Reinsurance Management Services, Inc.
Counter Defendant:
Charles Fair
Plaintiff:
Charles Fair
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Raser Technologies, Inc. et al v. Morgan Stanley & Co., LLC et al
as 1:2012cv01801
Plaintiff:
Raser Technologies, Inc. , Thomas Collentine, Jr. , Judith Collentine and others
Defendant:
Morgan Stanley & Co., LLC , Goldman, Sachs & Co. LP , Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Taser International, Inc. et al v. Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv03108
Plaintiff:
Taser International, Inc. , David Batchelor , Natalie Batchelor and others
Defendant:
Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc. , Goldman, Sachs & Co. , Goldman Sachs Execution & Clearing, L.P. and others
Pecial_master:
Henry D. Fellows
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
