Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Hicks v. Family Dollar
as 2:2019cv01453
Plaintiff:
Charles Hicks
Defendant:
Family Dollar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hicks v. Family Dollar
as 2:2017cv00870
Plaintiff:
Charles Hicks
Defendant:
Family Dollar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hicks v. Family Dollar Stores of Alabama LLC et al
as 2:2016cv01122
Plaintiff:
Charles Hicks
Defendant:
Family Dollar Stores of Alabama LLC and Realty Income Properties 29 LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hicks v. Western Express, Inc., et al
as 1:2013cv00065
Plaintiff:
Charles Hicks
Defendant:
Western Express, Inc. and Jeffery Allen Wilcox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv04107
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Hicks v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 4:2011cv01001
Plaintiff:
Charles Hicks
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hicks v. Alexander City Community Base et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2007cv00726
Plaintiff:
Charles Hicks
Defendant:
Alexander City Community Base and Glenn Newton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. United States Postal Services, Montgomery, Alabama et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2007cv00714
Plaintiff:
Charles Hicks
Defendant:
United States Postal Services, Montgomery, Alabama and United States Postal Services, Alexander City, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. Prison Health Services et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2007cv00668
Plaintiff:
Charles Hicks
Defendant:
Prison Health Services, Staton Correctional Facility, Leon Forniss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. Copeland et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2007cv00667
Plaintiff:
Charles Hicks
Defendant:
Willie Copeland and Staton Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
