Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Charles Kim v. Darnell Card, et al
as 22-17020
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CHARLES KIM
Defendant / Appellant:
DARNELL CARD
Defendant:
KRYSTAL PARKER
(UD)(PS) Kim v. Parker et al
as 2:2022cv02247
Plaintiff:
Charles Kim
Defendant:
Krystal Parker and Darnell Card
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Executive Digital LLC v. Kim
as 2:2022cv01550
Plaintiff:
Executive Digital LLC
Defendant:
Charles Kim, Digital Saints LLC, Saints LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030 Computer Fraud and Abuse Act
McGraw v. Kim et al
as 2:2022cv01414
Plaintiff:
John McGraw
Defendant:
Charles Kim, Linden Hospitality, LLC, First American Title Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
McGraw v. Kim et al
as 2:2021cv01792
Plaintiff:
John McGraw
Defendant:
Charles Kim, Linden Hospitality, LLC and First American Title Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Emperor v. Alpine Group USVI, LLC et al
as 3:2021cv00042
Defendant:
Jean Su Maeng-Kim, Charles Kim and Alpine Group USVI, LLC
Plaintiff:
Bryan Emperor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Reed v. Kim
as 5:2020cv05223
Defendant:
Charles Kim
Plaintiff:
Taylor Reed and James Reed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Shekarlab v. County of Sacramento et al
as 2:2018cv00047
Plaintiff:
Ramin Shekarlab
Defendant:
County of Sacramento, Robert Padilla, Charles Kim and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Kim et al v. Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois et al
as 2:2017cv05377
Defendant:
Does, Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois and Scottsdale Indemnity Company
Plaintiff:
Chris Haynes, II and Charles Kim
Cross Defendant:
Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois
Cross Claimant:
Scottsdale Indemnity Company
Kim et al v. Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois et al
as 2:2017cv05367
Plaintiff:
Chris Haynes, II and Charles Kim
Defendant:
Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois and Scottsdale Indemnity Company
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
