Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Lane v. West Virginia Dept. of Correctional Rehabilitation et al
as 5:2022cv00226
Plaintiff:
Charles Lane
Defendant:
West Virginia Dept. of Correctional Rehabilitation and U.S. Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eskridge et al v. West Virginia Dept. of Correctional Rehabilitation et al
as 5:2022cv00223
Plaintiff:
Billy Mason Eskridge, Bryant Carr and Charles Lane
Defendant:
West Virginia Dept. of Correctional Rehabilitation and U.S. Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Petrozzi v. State of Washington et al
as 3:2018cv05502
Plaintiff:
Timothy R Petrozzi
Defendant:
State of Washington, DSHS/WSH, Thurston County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Lane, III v. Dwight Neven, et al
as 17-16746
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES LANE III
Respondent - Appellee:
DWIGHT NEVEN, Warden and STATE OF NEVADA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Lane, III v. Neven et al
as 2:2014cv00794
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Nevada and Dwight Neven
Petitioner:
Charles Lane, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lane v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2014cv00543
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and State of Nevada
Petitioner:
Charles Lane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Kevin Bromwell, et al v. George Lombardi, et al
as 13-1123
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kevin Bromwell, Billy Turner, Roger Dale Merchant and others
Defendant - Appellee:
George Lombardi, Director MO Dept of Corrections and Jeremiah Nixon, Governor
Bromwell et al v. Lombardi et al
as 4:2012cv01306
Plaintiff:
Kevin Bromwell, Billy Turner, Roger D Merchant and others
Defendant:
George Lombardi and Jeremiah Nixon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lane v. State of Missouri et al
as 4:2012cv01008
Petitioner:
Charles Lane, Jr
Respondent:
Jeff Norman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
