Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Chavez Meza v. Love
as 4:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
Perla Chavez Meza
Defendant:
Charles Love
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
LOVE et al v. INDEPENDENT COLD ENTERPRISE, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv03280
Plaintiff:
CHARLES LOVE and CHRISTINE LOVE
Defendant:
INDEPENDENT COLD ENTERPRISE, LLC and RALPH A COBURN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Love v. Rush Health Systems, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00803
Plaintiff:
Charles Love
Defendant:
Rush Health Systems, Inc. doing business as Rush Foundation Hospital, MD George L. Petty and Unknown John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00507
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Lovely v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv03473
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Charles Lovely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Love et al v. Universal Music Group, Inc.
as 4:2013cv00502
Plaintiff:
Charles Love , Harry Williams and Charles McCormick
Defendant:
Universal Music Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Baker et al v. Amsted Rail Co., Inc.
as 3:2013cv00006
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Baker , Jack Ball , Les Bennett and others
Defendant:
Amsted Rail Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv08067
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-6899
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Movant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Party-in-Interest:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Whitedeer et al v. Love et al
as 3:2011cv01426
Plaintiff:
Whitedeer , Essential Herbal Technologies LLC and Zap'O Marks, Inc., a California corporation
Defendant:
Ronald Charles Love and Glow Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
