Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Riddle v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv00783
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Mr. Deason, Charles McKee and others
Plaintiff:
Dion Edward Riddle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Dunn et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv00758
Defendant:
Karla Jones, Alabama Department of Corrections, Alicia White and others
Plaintiff:
Quintell R. Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eatmon v. McKee et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv00155
Defendant:
Nicholas L. Hall, Gerald Tippins and Charles McKee
Plaintiff:
Jamie Eatmon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Learonardo Truss v. Warden, et al
as 15-13431
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEARONARDO TRUSS
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN and CHARLES MCKEE
Ervin v. Daniels et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2013cv00468
Plaintiff:
Theophlis R. Ervin
Defendant:
Leeposey Daniels and Charles McKee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oden v. Thomas et al(INMATE 2)
as 2:2013cv00388
Plaintiff:
Brandon M. Oden
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas, Leeposey Daniels, Charles McKee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oden v. Thomas et al
as 2:2013cv00425
Plaintiff:
Brandon M. Oden
Defendant:
Kim Thomas, Leeposey Daniels and Charles McKee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Snell v. Daniels et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2012cv01075
Plaintiff:
Ronald Clyde Snell
Defendant:
Leeposey Daniels, Charles McKee, Althea Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Daniels, et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2012cv01008
Plaintiff:
Billy Mitchell
Defendant:
Leeposey Daniels, Leon Bolling, Charles McKee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Learonardo Truss v. Warden, et al
as 12-15229
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEARONARDO TRUSS
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN, CHARLES MCKEE, WILLIE THOMAS BURTON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
