Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Stout v. Smith International Inc et al
as 6:2022cv06036
Plaintiff:
Charles Robert Stout
Defendant:
Smith International, Inc., Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Nicole Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
MARQUEZ DIAZ et al v. ANCAR SERVICES, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv01157
Plaintiff:
SERGIO MARQUEZ DIAZ and JOSE ESTANGLE ALVARADO VENTURA
Defendant:
ANCAR SERVICES, INC. and CHARLES ROBERT NUGENT
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Roberts v. Sanders Steel Erectors, Inc.
as 0:2014cv05029
Plaintiff:
Charles Roberts
Defendant:
Sanders Steel Erectors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1002
Roberts, et al. v. Roden Iron, Inc.
as 0:2014cv05014
Plaintiff:
Charles Roberts
Defendant:
Roden Iron, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1131
Stout v. Pathfinder Energy Services L L C et al
as 6:2014cv02457
Plaintiff:
Charles Robert Stout
Defendant:
Pathfinder Energy Services L L C, Smith International Inc, Schlumberger Technology Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Carl Lee Eller, et al v. NFL Players Association, et al
as 12-2487
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Carl Lee Eller, Charles Philip Bednarik, Paul James Krause and others
Defendant - Appellee:
National Football League Players Association, Tom Brady, Mike Vrabel and others
Eller et al v. National Football League Players Association et al
as 0:2011cv02623
Plaintiff:
Carl Lee Eller , Charles Philip Bednarik , Paul James Krause and others
Defendant:
National Football League Players Association , Tom Brady , Mike Vrabel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
ROBERTS v. SCHWAN'S SHARED SERVICES, LLC
as 1:2008cv01258
Plaintiff:
CHARLES ROBERTS
Defendant:
SCHWAN'S SHARED SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Saunders v. Aecom Government Services Inc
as 2:2008cv00627
Defendant:
Aecom Government Services Inc
Plaintiff:
Charles Robert Saunders
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
