Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Smith v. Bell
as 1:2021cv03570
Respondent:
Superintendent Bell
Petitioner:
Charles Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Bell
as 9:2021cv00609
Respondent:
Superintendent Bell
Petitioner:
Charles Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. DOCCS et al
as 9:2020cv00659
Plaintiff:
Charles J. Smith and Charles Smith
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe #2, Dept. of Motor Vehicle Program, John/Jane Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00571
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
DS et al v Rochester City School District et al
as 6:2019cv06528
Plaintiff:
R. Brian Goewey, CS and DS
Defendant:
Kim Garlock, Nancy Resto, Nicole McCoy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Aluotto et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11459
Plaintiff:
Anthony Reyes, William Lappe, Luis Orsini and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Bookman et al. v. City Of New York
as 1:2018cv04338
Plaintiff:
Marvin Smith, Tahir Young, Charles Smith and others
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW YORK
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Lawtone-Bowles et al v. City of New York, New York
as 1:2016cv04240
Plaintiff:
Nicole Lawtone-Bowles , Ramzan Alli , Gib Brown and others
Defendant:
City of New York, New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Muhammad v. New York State et al
as 6:2016cv06005
Plaintiff:
Prince divine Messiah Muhammad
Defendant:
New York State, Vincent Miccoli, Kirby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad v. Rabinowitz et al
as 1:2015cv05651
Plaintiff:
Prince Divine Messiah Muhammad
Defendant:
Steve Rabinowitz, New York State, Vincent Miccoli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
