Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Lanford v. Tipton et al (INMATE 3)
as 5:2020cv01949
Defendant:
Charles Tipton, State of Alabama, Scott Rogers and others
Plaintiff:
Rickey Glenn Lanford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lanford v. Tipton et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2020cv00820
Defendant:
Charles Tipton, Steven T. Marshall, State of Alabama and others
Plaintiff:
Rickey Glenn Lanford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. Ivey et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00703
Plaintiff:
Toree Jones
Defendant:
Charles Tipton, Alabama Department of Corrections, Kay Ivey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Dunn et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00583
Defendant:
Angie Baggett, Jefferson S. Dunn and Charles Tipton
Plaintiff:
Quinton Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chiarizio v. Murrill et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2020cv00582
Defendant:
Charles Tipton, Alabama Department of Corrections, Karla Walker Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Chiarizio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Watson v. Dunn et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00541
Defendant:
Angie Baggett, Charles Tipton and Jefferson S. Dunn
Plaintiff:
Julian Brett Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Dunn et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00545
Defendant:
Angie Baggett, Charles Tipton and Jefferson S. Dunn
Plaintiff:
Webster Dewayne Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Levert v. Dunn et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00546
Defendant:
Angie Baggett, Jefferson S. Dunn and Charles Tipton
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Levert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. Dunn et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00544
Defendant:
Angie Baggett, Charles Tipton and Jefferson S. Dunn
Plaintiff:
Samuel Washington, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Dunn et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00542
Plaintiff:
Toree Jones
Defendant:
Charles Tipton, Jefferson S. Dunn and Angie Baggett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
