Cases 1 - 8 of 8
ROBINSON v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC et al
as 3:2021cv06365
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC
Plaintiff:
CHARLIE ROBINSON
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robinson v. Combe Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv14122
Defendant:
Combe Products Inc., Combe Laboratories, Inc., Combe International, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Charlie Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cornerstone Vending, Inc. v. Charlie's Novelty Company, LLC et al
as 4:2014cv04020
Plaintiff:
Cornerstone Vending, Inc.
Defendant:
Charlie's Novelty Company, LLC and Charlie Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Patterson v. Pearson Education, Inc.
as 5:2012cv00095
Plaintiff:
Shelley Patterson
Defendant:
Pearson Education, Inc. and Charlie Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Charlie Robinson v. Secretary, DOC, et al
as 10-11389
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLIE ROBINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Walter McNeil, JAMES CROSBY, Former, Secretary Department of Corrections, ORLESTER DICKENS, Secretary's Representative and others
Robinson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2010cv00323
Plaintiff:
Charlie Robinson
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections, James Crosby, Orlester Dickens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Allstate Texas Lloyd's et al
as 1:2007cv00907
Plaintiff:
Charlie Robinson
Defendant:
Allstate Texas Lloyd's, Allstate Texas Lloyd's, Allstate Texas Lloyd's and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
ROBINSON v. MCDONOUGH et al
as 4:2007cv00101
Plaintiff:
CHARLIE ROBINSON
Defendant:
JAMES MCDONOUGH, JAMES CROSBY, ORLESTER DICKENS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
