Cases 1 - 10 of 7,447
Southern Travel International Corp. et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 1:2025cv22244
Plaintiff:
Southern Travel International Corp. and Natalia Muela
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2025cv80591
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
v. Prince et al
as 1:2025cv01561
Defendant:
Edduard Prince, JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. and Jamie Dimon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Foreclosure
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Diamantis et al
as 3:2025cv00552
Plaintiff:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Christopher Diamantis and Andrea Gabor Diamantis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Fleetzero Inc. v. Atlantic Oceanic, LLC et al
as 4:2025cv02154
Plaintiff:
Fleetzero Inc.
Defendant:
Atlantic Oceanic, LLC
Garnishee:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv01204
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv01196
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Mid-South Metals v. Rodriguez
as 25-30270
Plaintiff:
Mid-South Metals, L.L.C.
Defendant:
Christopher Rodriguez and JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv03909
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Fagelbaum v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
as 9:2025cv80539
Plaintiff:
Maxine Phyllis Fagelbaum
Defendant:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., D.O. John Doe and JOHN DOE NO 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
