Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Tsur-Tsar et al v. Chase Bank USA NA
as 3:2020cv02368
Plaintiff:
Stefani Tsur-Tsar and Peter Buhay
Defendant:
Chase Bank USA, NA and Chase Bank USA NA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640
Todd v. Chase Bank USA NA
as 5:2017cv00553
Plaintiff:
Willard T Todd
Defendant:
Chase Bank USA NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
John B Kozlowski et al v. Chase Bank USA NA
as 5:2013cv01098
Defendant:
Chase Bank USA NA
Plaintiff:
John B Kozlowski and Kim E Kozlowski
Gevorg Yanukyan v. Bank of America NA et al
as 2:2012cv07529
Defendant:
Bank of America NA, Capital One NA, Chase Bank USA NA and others
Plaintiff:
Gevorg Yanukyan
Patricia Handley v. Chase Bank USA NA, et al
as 11-3568
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATRICIA A. HANDLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
CHASE BANK USA NA and REED SMITH
Patricia Handley v. Chase Bank USA NA, et al
as 11-3569
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATRICIA A. HANDLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
CHASE BANK USA NA, a/k/a BANK ONE CORP. and CITIBANK NA, (SOUTH DAKOTA)
HANDLEY v. CHASE BANK USA, NA et al
as 2:2011cv02904
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA A. HANDLEY
Defendant:
CHASE BANK USA, NA and REED SMITH LLP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Richmond et al v. NETCO Incorporated et al
as 2:2011cv00793
Plaintiff:
Ty Richmond and Karrie Richmond
Defendant:
NETCO Incorporated, Lender Processing Services Incorporated , T.D. Service Company of Arizona and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Homesales, Inc. v. Mitchell et al
as 3:2010cv00792
Defendant:
All Persons in Possession and Ralph D. Mitchell
ThirdParty Defendant:
Chase Bank USA, NA, Chase Home Finance, LLC, Homesales, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Homesales, Inc.
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
Ralph D. Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Kenneth Taggart v. Chase Bank USA NA, et al
as 09-4509
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH J. TAGGART
Defendant - Appellee:
CHASE BANK USA NA and JP MORGAN CHASE BANK NA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
