Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Lin v. Lin et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv09263
Plaintiff: Chun Hua Lin
Defendant: Xiu Ying Lin, Jin Cheng Lin, Xiuying Lin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ra-Amari et al v. RE/MAX, LLC et al
as 4:2022cv03171
Plaintiff: James Ra-Amari, Misty Ra-Amari and Rosemary Afful
Defendant: RE/MAX, LLC, EXP Realty, LLC, UMRE Investment Holdings, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03866
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv05988
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01539
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Lin v. LaManna We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv05005
Respondent: Jamie LaManna
Petitioner: Jin Cheng Lin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv03232
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. LIN
as 2:2017cv00875
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant: YU-CHENG LIN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Tart Optical Enterprises, LLC v. Yao Hsuan Wang, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv08628
Defendant: China Vision Co., Ltd., Does, Hot Ice Optical Company and others
Plaintiff: Tart Optical Enterprises, LLC
Lin v. Lynch
as 16-3677
Petitioner: Cheng Lin
Respondent: Loretta E. Lynch, United States Attorney General

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?