Cases
Cherie Townsend v. Christopher Derry et al
as 2:2021cv02156
Plaintiff: Cherie Townsend
Defendant: Christopher Derry and County of Los Angeles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cherie Townsend, et al v. USDC-CALA
as 19-71213
Not Classified By Court: DOES, 1-20, inclusive, BRITT HUFF, an individual, CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES, a public entity and others
Petitioner: CHERIE TOWNSEND, an individual and JALEN LAPREE HAMLER, an individual
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Cherie Townsend et al v. Jim McDonnell et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv10011
Defendant: Michael Austin, Susan M Brooks, Los Angeles Sheriffs Department and others
Plaintiff: Jalen Lapree Hamler and Cherie Townsend
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hall et al v. Bayer Corporation et al
as 4:2017cv01999
Plaintiff: Jamie Hall , Mishel Williams , Brandi Stone and others
Defendant: Bayer Corporation , Bayer Healthcare LLC , Bayer Essure Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hall et al v. Bayer Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2016cv01523
Plaintiff: Jamie Hall , Mishel Williams , Brandi Stone and others
Defendant: Bayer Corporation , Bayer Essure Inc. , Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nash v. Cook County et al
as 1:2014cv03502
Defendant: Cook County and Tom Dart
Plaintiff: Robert Nash
Respondent: Eva Kurilo, Julian Williams, Howard Paul and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-16454
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
K.C. et al v. Nedelkoff et al
as 6:2009cv00012
Plaintiff: K.C., K.C., K.C. and others
Defendant: Richard Nedelkoff, Richard Nedelkoff, James Smith and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Civil Rights None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?