Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Joseph Constant v. DTE Electric Company, et al
as 20-1514
Defendant / Appellee: NANCI J. GRANT, MICHAEL DAVID WARREN, JAMES M. HAMMOND and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: JOSEPH CONSTANT
Constant v. DTE Electric Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv10339
Defendant: DTE Electric Company, DTE, James M. Hammond and others
Plaintiff: Joseph Constant
Rea v. Cooper et al
as 2:2018cv10014
Defendant: Jessica R. Cooper, David Randall, Kenneth DeLano and others
Plaintiff: Gino Robert Rea
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Antio et al v. Richardson et al
as 2:2017cv12373
Plaintiff: Melissa Antio, Andrew Emond, Leslie Emond and others
Defendant: Benton Richardson, Audrey Stroia, Jeffrey Sherbo and others
Joseph Constant v. Cheryl Matthew
as 17-1750
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOSEPH CONSTANT
Defendant - Appellee: CHERYL A. MATTHEWS
Constant v. Matthews We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2016cv14501
Defendant: Cheryl A Matthews
Plaintiff: Joseph Constant [E-filer]
US BANK TRUST NA v. MATTHEWS et al
as 2:2016cv00405
Plaintiff: US BANK TRUST NA
Defendant: CHERYL M MATTHEWS and RICHARD T. MATTHEWS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Matthews et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2016cv01707
Plaintiff: Cheryl A Matthews and Harry T Matthews
Defendant: DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Products Inc , Johnson & Johnson Services Inc and others
Pecial_master: Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
William Alexander v. Gerald Rosen, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-1265
Plaintiff - Appellant: WILLIAM ALEXANDER
Defendant - Appellee: GERALD E. ROSEN, CHERYL A. MATTHEWS, MICHELLE ENDRES and others
William Alexander v. Gerald Rosen, et al
as 15-1243
Plaintiff - Appellant: WILLIAM ALEXANDER
Defendant - Appellee: GERALD E. ROSEN, CHERYL A. MATTHEWS, MICHELLE ENDRES and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?