Cases 41 - 50 of 62
Knox v. Sockey et al
as 6:2009cv00274
Plaintiff:
Antone L. Knox
Defendant:
W.A. Sockey, Amanda Workman, Vickie Harless and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cannon v. Mason, et al
as 09-7062
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEMAINE MONTEIL CANNON
Defendant - Appellee:
CHESTER MASON, Correctional Health Services Administrator, DR. STEWART and LINDA MONTGOMERY, LPN - Licensed Practical Nurse
Williams v. Sirmon, et al
as 09-7043
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MILTON VERAN WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
MARTY SIRMON, Warden, JUSTIN JONES, Director of DOC, STEVE MOLES and others
Cannon v. Mason, et al
as 09-7023
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEMAINE MONTEIL CANNON
Defendant - Appellee:
CHESTER MASON, Health Services Administrator and DR. STEWART
Cannon v. Mason, et al
as 09-7021
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEMAINE MONTEIL CANNON
Defendant - Appellee:
CHESTER MASON, Health Services Administrator and RAYMOND STEWART
Defendant:
JANE DOE, Nurse
Cannon v. Mason, et al
as 09-7020
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEMAINE MONTEIL CANNON
Defendant - Appellee:
CHESTER MASON, OSP Health Services Administrator, STEWART, OSP Physician, MILLER, OSP provider for ophthalmology services and others
Cannon v. Mason, et al
as 09-7022
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEMAINE MONTEIL CANNON
Defendant - Appellee:
CHESTER MASON, STEWART and MILLER
Davis v. Jones et al
as 6:2009cv00092
Plaintiff:
Ezekiel Davis
Defendant:
Justin Jones, Randy Workman, Chief Medical Officer and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Schram v. Department of Corrections, Oklahoma State Penitentiary, et al.
as 6:2009cv00040
Plaintiff:
L. Ray Schram, Jr.
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Oklahoma State Penitentiary, Marty Sirmons, Marty Sirmons and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Cannon v. Mason, et al
as 08-7117
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEMAINE MONTEIL CANNON
Defendant - Appellee:
CHESTER MASON, Heath Services Administrator, STEWART, D.O. and NANCY COPPLE, LPN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
