Cases
Lawrence Rougier, et al v. Applied Optoelectronics, Inc., et al
as 20-90002
Not Yet Classified: RICHARD HAMILTON, LAWRENCE ROUGIER, STEFAN J. MURRY and others
Ng et al v. Lin et al
as 4:2018cv04751
Defendant: Alex Ignatiev, Richard B Black, Stefan J. Murry and others
Plaintiff: Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. and Yiu Kwong Ng
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jin v. Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv02713
Defendant: Applied Optoelectronics, Inc., Alex Ignatie, Richard B Black and others
Plaintiff: Lei Jin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rizzo v. Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv05313
Defendant: Applied Optoelectronics, Inc., Chih-Hsiang (Thompson) Lin and Stefan J. Murry
Plaintiff: Gianluca Rizzo
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Rizzo v. Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv05313
Defendant: Applied Optoelectronics, Inc., Chih-Hsiang (Thompson) Lin and Stefan J. Murry
Movant: Philip R. Deubler, Jr., Lawrence Rougier and Daniel Sisto
Plaintiff: Gianluca Rizzo
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Rougier v. Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2017cv02399
Defendant: Stefan J. Murry, Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. and Chih-Hsiang Thompson Lin
Plaintiff: Mona Abouzied, Kristen Knight, Mark Naglich and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: Chad Ludwig
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?