Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Abt, Gary v. Johnson, D. et al
as 3:2024cv00264
Plaintiff:
Gary P. Abt
Defendant:
D. Johnson, Jenna L. Parks and Chris Buesgen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaughnessy, Chris v. Buesgen, Chris
as 3:2024cv00154
Petitioner:
Chris Shaughnessy
Respondent:
Chris Buesgen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shaw, Antonio v. Buesgen, Chris
as 3:2024cv00119
Petitioner:
Antonio P. Shaw, Jr.
Respondent:
Chris Buesgen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gates, Donta v. Haupt, Travis et al
as 3:2023cv00837
Plaintiff:
Donta Gates
Defendant:
Travis Haupt, Chris Buesgen, Mario Canzian and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lloyd, Nathaniel v. Buesgen, Chris et al
as 3:2023cv00788
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Joseph Lloyd
Defendant:
Chris Buesgen, John Doe (property/mail supervisor), Claire Hickey-Wilbur and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Buesgen et al
as 2:2023cv01340
Plaintiff:
Fontaine L Baker, Sr
Defendant:
Chris Buesgen, Mr Zemaitis, Mr Anglemyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rumsey v. Buesgen
as 2:2023cv01252
Petitioner:
Curtis James Rumsey
Respondent:
Warden Chris Buesgen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Byrd, Phillip v. Buesgen, Chris
as 3:2023cv00639
Petitioner:
Phillip Byrd
Respondent:
Chris Buesgen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LaFaive v. Buesgen
as 2:2023cv01123
Petitioner:
Terrence T LaFaive
Respondent:
Chris Buesgen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barnes, Garland v. Buesgen, Chris
as 3:2023cv00519
Petitioner:
Garland Dean Barnes
Respondent:
Chris Buesgen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
