Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Richard Shreves v. David Harris, et al
as 23-35154
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD E. SHREVES
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID WILLIAM HARRIS, WENDY ZUBER, MARISA BOSTWICK and others
Richard Shreves v. USDC-MHE
as 21-71407
Not Classified By Court:
In re: RICHARD E. SHREVES, DAVID WILLIAM HARRIS, WENDY ZUBER and others
Petitioner:
RICHARD E. SHREVES
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA, HELENA
Friedt v. Kloos et al
as 1:2021cv00057
Defendant:
Michelle McKinnon, C. Potuzak, Susan Kloos and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis Friedt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Burkbile et al
as 4:2021cv00021
Defendant:
Conell, Burkbile, Vines and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shreves v. Harris et al
as 6:2018cv00097
Defendant:
Michael Bury, Michael Zuber, Chris Conell and others
Plaintiff:
Richard E. Shreves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ford v. Michael et al
as 6:2018cv00060
Plaintiff:
Eugene Ford
Defendant:
Reginald Michael, Mike Batista, Mike Mahoney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brent Manny v. Leroy Kirkegard, et al
as 17-35750
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRENT WILLIAM MANNY
Defendant - Appellee:
LEROY KIRKEGARD, CHRIS CONELL, KEVIN HART, Sergeant and others
Manny v. Kirkegard et al
as 6:2017cv00005
Plaintiff:
Brent William Manny
Defendant:
Leroy Kirkegard, Chris Conell, Kevin Hart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Douglas Chyatte v. Montana Department of Correcti, et al
as 16-35883
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOUGLAS J. CHYATTE
Defendant - Appellee:
MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MONTANA STATE PRISON, MIKE BATISTA and others
Chyatte v. Montana Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2016cv00064
Plaintiff:
Douglas J. Chyatte
Defendant:
Montana Department of Corrections, Montana State Prison, Mike Batista and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
