Cases 1 - 10 of 10
LONG v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv14986
Plaintiff:
CHRIS LONG
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
In re Subpoena Duces Tecum as to Chris Long
as 8:2019cv03082
Respondent:
HNLEA NCR, et al.
In Re:
Subpoena Duces Tecum
Petitioner:
Chris Long
SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM
as 1:2019mc00159
In Re:
SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM
Petitioner:
CHRIS LONG
Respondent:
HNLEA NCR, et al.
Vinson v. Long et al
as 4:2016cv01484
Plaintiff:
Dewitt Vinson
Defendant:
Chris Long, Jay Cantrell and Austin Nash
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adamo, et al v. Genzyme Corporation
as 15-1447
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PHILIP ADAMO, JAMES BEADNELL, JOY BEADNELL and others
Defendant:
MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE OF THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK
Defendant - Appellee:
GENZYME CORPORATION
Tholson v. Long et al
as 3:2014cv00257
Plaintiff:
Leon-Michael: Tholson
Defendant:
Chris Long and Bartlett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adamo, et al. v. Genzyme Corporation, et al.
as 1:2013cv11336
Plaintiff:
Philip Adamo , James Beadnell , Joy Beadnell and others
Defendant:
Genzyme Corporation and Mount Sinai School of Medicine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
OBrien et al v. 1438 Tranquilla Road, LLC et al
as 3:2011cv00452
Plaintiff:
Rita OBrien , Melody Landay , Chris Long and others
Defendant:
1438 Tranquilla Road, LLC , D W Gold Construction Inc , David W Goldstein and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
