Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Walter Gause v. Curtis Driggers
as 21-7674
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WALTER TIMOTHY GAUSE
Defendant / Appellee:
CURTIS DRIGGERS, Det. of C.M.P.D., individually and in his official capacity, DENZIL H. FORRETA, individually and in his official capacity, KIMBERLY P. HOPPIN, Appellant Atty., individually and in her official capacity and others
Reaves v. Trosh et al
as 3:2021cv00606
Plaintiff:
Cherry Reaves
Defendant:
Elizabeth Trosh, Twyola Hollingsworth, Hugh Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gause v. Driggers et al
as 3:2021cv00553
Plaintiff:
Walter Timothy Gause
Defendant:
Curtis Driggers, Denzil H. Forreta, Kimberly P. Hoppin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hinton v. Bridges et al
as 3:2013cv00119
Plaintiff:
Charles Everette Hinton
Defendant:
Forrest D. Bridges, Christian Hoel, Andrew Murray and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Hinton v. Curran et al
as 5:2013ct03037
Plaintiff:
Charles Everette Hinton
Defendant:
Martha H. Curran, Andrew Murray, Christian Hoel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hinton v. Conrad et al
as 3:2012cv00367
Plaintiff:
Charles Everette Hinton
Defendant:
Robert J. Conrad, Jr., Rebecca C. Evans, Andrew Murray and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Hinton v. Evans et al
as 3:2011cv00631
Plaintiff:
Charles Everette Hinton
Defendant:
Rebecca C. Evans, Andrew Murray, FNU Proctor and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Charles Hinton v. Linda Lopez
as 11-6918
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES EVERETTE HINTON
Defendant - Appellee:
LINDA LOPEZ, ANDREW MURRAY, CHRISTIAN HOEL and others
Hinton v. Lopez et al
as 3:2011cv00316
Plaintiff:
Charles Everette Hinton
Defendant:
Linda Lopez, Andrew Murray, Christian Hoel and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Charles Hinton v. Andrew Murray
as 11-6596
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES EVERETTE HINTON
Defendant - Appellee:
ANDREW MURRAY, CHRISTIAN HOEL, WILLIAM BELL and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
