Cases 1 - 10 of 48
(PC) Lopez v. CDCR
as 1:2024cv00734
Defendant:
CDCR
Plaintiff:
Christian Lopez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Lopez v. CDCR
as 1:2024cv00729
Plaintiff:
Christian Lopez
Defendant:
CDCR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ervin v. Barnes et al
as 4:2024cv00046
Defendant:
Dillian Seibers, Brandon Barnes, Hunter Rowland and others
Plaintiff:
Jackie Darrell Ervin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Salaman
as 24-1124
Defendant:
LUIS SALAMAN, ISMAEL HEREDIA, CHRISTIAN LOPEZ and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Ervin v. Barnes et al
as 3:2024cv00487
Plaintiff:
Jackie Darrell Ervin
Defendant:
Brandon Barnes, Jamison Marriman, Dillian Seibers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Lopez et al
as 1:2023cv00273
Plaintiff:
Christopher Gray Young
Defendant:
Christian Lopez, Cevin York, Tommy Maynard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright et al v. Lopez et al
as 1:2023cv00272
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Wright, Jr. and Vondale Eugene Solomon
Defendant:
Christian Lopez, Cevin York, Brandon Barnes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ettienne v. Lopez et al
as 1:2023cv00244
Plaintiff:
Ronald Ettienne
Defendant:
Christian Lopez, Kevin York, Brandon Barnes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Triumph Designs Limited v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified On Schedule A
as 1:2023cv03614
Plaintiff:
Triumph Designs Limited
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified On Schedule A, Guangzhou Fonsenx Technology Co., Ltd., Yongkang City Superinch Industry & Trade Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Lopez v. Garland
as 23-870
Petitioner:
CHRISTIAN LOPEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.