Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 392
Moten v. United States District Court for the Central District of California
as 24-1858
Petitioner: SHARROD MOTEN
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Interested Party: CHRISTIAN PFEIFFER
Howell v. Pfeiffer We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00420
Plaintiff: Kareen Jabbar Howell
Respondent: Christian Pfeiffer
Petitioner: Kareem Jabbar Howell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gowdy v. Pfeiffer
as 24-637
Petitioner: CARL EUGENE GOWDY, JR.
Respondent: CHRISTIAN PFEIFFER
Gowdy v. Pfeiffer
as 24-594
Petitioner / Appellant: CARL EUGENE GOWDY, JR.
Respondent / Appellee: CHRISTIAN PFEIFFER, Warden
(HC) Sanchez v. Pfeiffer We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv02806
Petitioner: Anthony A. Sanchez
Respondent: Christian Pfeiffer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Parker v. Lynch et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv01674
Plaintiff: Melvin A. Parker
Defendant: Jeff Lynch and Christian Pfeiffer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cox v. Pfeiffer
as 23-4113
Petitioner / Appellant: EVERETT LEE COX
Respondent / Appellee: CHRISTIAN PFEIFFER
Young v. Custer. et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv01519
Plaintiff: Sidney Kang
Defendant: Custer and Christian Pfeiffer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sharrod Moten v. Christian Pfeiffer
as 2:2023cv08737
Petitioner: Sharrod Moten
Respondent: Christian Pfeiffer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Thomas v. Pfeiffer et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv01232
Plaintiff: Michael Thomas
Defendant: Christian Pfeiffer, Akau, Mohammed Ali and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?