Cases 51 - 60 of 392
(PC) Martin v. Delacruz et al
as 1:2022cv01351
Plaintiff:
Jared Andrew Martin
Defendant:
A. Delacruz, Christian Pfeiffer, City of Delano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bobby Brown v. USDC-CAFR
as 22-70260
Not Classified By Court:
In re: BOBBY E. BROWN, OTTO MARROQUIN, Correctional Officer at KVSP, DARIUS CAMPBELL, Correctional Officer at KVSP and others
Petitioner:
BOBBY E. BROWN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO
(HC) Mayorga v. Pfeiffer
as 2:2022cv01940
Petitioner:
Mario Michael Mayorga
Respondent:
People of California State of California and Christian Pfeiffer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Guillory v. Pfeiffer et al
as 1:2022cv01336
Plaintiff:
Jovan R. Guillory
Defendant:
Christian Pfeiffer, J. Montecino, C. Xiaddle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Tucker v. Lopez et al
as 1:2022cv01458
Plaintiff:
Jordan Tucker
Defendant:
G. Lopez and Christian Pfeiffer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel Arzaga v. Christian Pfeiffer
as 22-56004
Petitioner / Appellant:
DANIEL JESUS ARZAGA
Respondent / Appellee:
CHRISTIAN PFEIFFER, Warden
(PC) Lewis v. Newsome et al
as 1:2022cv01036
Plaintiff:
Daronta Tyrone Lewis
Defendant:
Gavin Newsome, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Deputy Director of CDCR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Joyner v. Pfeiffer
as 2:2022cv01577
Petitioner:
Sean L. Joyner
Respondent:
Christian Pfeiffer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Martin v. Castillo et al
as 1:2022cv01172
Plaintiff:
Jared Andrew Martin
Defendant:
D. Castillo, Christian Pfeiffer and Officer Jimenez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.