Cases 1 - 10 of 14
BATEMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv19348
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER BATEMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tschetter v. Rotor Leasing, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01837
Plaintiff:
Kim Tschetter
Defendant:
Brian Clements, Rotor Leasing, Inc and Christopher Bateman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2018cv01394
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
FRAENKEL v. GARCIA et al
as 3:2018cv09281
Plaintiff:
ALEX FRAENKEL
Defendant:
WILLIAM GARCIA, MATTHEW ERNY, ROBERT PAVELCHAK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edward Kates v. Christopher Christie, et al
as 15-3940
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD KATES
Defendant - Appellee:
NEW JERSEY GOVENOR CHRISTOPHER J. CHRISTIE, JOHN J. HOFFMAN, Acting Attorney General, JAMES T. PLOUSIS and others
Debtor - Appellee:
JOHN DIMAIO
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2015cv02096
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Edward Kates v. Christopher Christie, et al
as 15-2259
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD KATES
Defendant - Appellee:
NEW JERSEY GOVERNOR CHRISTOPHER J. CHRISTIE, JOHN J. HOFFMAN, Acting Attorney General, JAMES T. PLOUSIS and others
KATES v. CHRISTIE et al
as 2:2014cv05769
Plaintiff:
EDWARD KATES
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY GOVERNOR CHRIS CHRISTIE, JOHN J. HOFFMAN, JAMES T. PLOUSIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WILSON v. LANIGAN et al
as 2:2014cv03746
Defendant:
GARY M. LANIGAN, JAMES T. PLOUSIS, SAMUEL J. PLUMERI, JR. and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH WILSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Megly et al v. Turquoise Hill Resources Ltd. et al
as 1:2013cv08846
Plaintiff:
Daniel C. Megly , Selma Ehrlich and Richard M. Ehrlich
Defendant:
Turquoise Hill Resources Ltd., John Macken, Tony Giardini and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
