Cases 1 - 10 of 603
Valerie Arroyo v. Pretium Partners LLC
as 25-1341
Plaintiff:
VALERIE ARROYO, in her personal capacity
Defendant:
PRETIUM PARTNERS LLC, in its official capacity, DONALD MULLEN, as CEO & Owner, in his official and personal capacity, PROGRESS RESIDENTIAL BORROWER 12 LLC, in its official capacity and others
United States v. Christopher Weigert
as 25-1645
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Christopher William Weigert
Valerie Arroyo v. Pretium Partners LLC
as 25-1324
Plaintiff:
VALERIE ARROYO, in her personal capacity
Defendant:
PRETIUM PARTNERS LLC, in its official capacity, DONALD MULLEN, as CEO & Owner, in his official and personal capacity, PROGRESS RESIDENTIAL BORROWER 12 LLC, in its official capacity and others
Easton Mark Inc v. Crumley et al
as 2:2025cv00513
Plaintiff:
Easton Mark, Inc
Defendant:
Jordan Crumley, Christopher Williams, Raymond Sahadeo and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
USA v. Sean Williams
as 25-5174
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
SEAN CHRISTOPHER WILLIAMS
USA v. Sean Williams
as 25-5175
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
SEAN CHRISTOPHER WILLIAMS
Antonio Fluker, Jr. v. Bryan Dunn, et al
as 25-1180
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO LYNN FLUKER, JR.
Defendant:
BRYAN DUNN, Lieutenant, AARON HOULE, Sergeant, ANDREW COULSON, Corporal and others
Williams v. Simpson (F.N.U.) et al
as 6:2025cv00023
Plaintiff:
Christopher Williams
Defendant:
Simpson (F.N.U.) and USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Roberts et al v. Transco Lines, Inc. et al
as 2:2025cv00009
Plaintiff:
Christopher Roberts, Tiki Roberts, Stephen Kennedy and others
Defendant:
Transco Lines, INC., Brian Christopher Williams and John Does A-Z
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01348
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
