Cases 1 - 10 of 224
Williams v. Chatham County Detention Center
as 4:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lamar Williams
Defendant:
Chatham County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Chambers-Smith et al
as 2:2024cv00393
Plaintiff:
Christopher-Michael Williams
Defendant:
Annette Chambers-Smith, Lt. Ashley Marsh, Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christopher Williams v. Pavan Parikh, et al
as 24-3059
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL WILLIAMS
Defendant:
PAVAN PARIKH, Hamilton County Clerk of Court and HAMILTON COUNTY, OH CLERK OF COURTS, All Clerk Staff
WILLIAMS v. RULE
as 2:2024cv00006
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER L. WILLIAMS
Respondent:
T. RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Williams v. State of South Carolina
as 2:2023cv06931
Petitioner:
Christopher S. Williams
Respondent:
State of South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Evers et al
as 2:2023cv01013
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bernard Williams
Defendant:
Governor Tony Evers and Secretary Kevin Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. State of South Carolina
as 5:2023hc02169
Petitioner:
Chris Shawn Williams and Christopher S. Williams
Respondent:
State of South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2023cv00631
Plaintiff:
Christopher M. Williams
Defendant:
State of Nevada, Nevada Department of Corrections, Lovelock Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. State of South Carolina,
as 2:2023cv01290
Petitioner:
Christopher S. Williams
Respondent:
State of South Carolina,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
