Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Williams v. Hoey et al
as 3:2020cv00737
Defendant:
B.M. Antonelli, Dr. S. Hoey, Christopher Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Delvon Lamar Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davy v. USA
as 3:2016cv00776
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Christopher Davy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
DAVIS v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2016cv00131
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER DAVIS
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA and M. FARRELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
J & J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC. v. DAVIS et al
as 2:2012cv06993
Plaintiff:
J & J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER DAVIS, JOSHUA RINGGOLD INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A REUBEN'S MARC A/K/A VILLAGE BAR and CHRISTOPHER MARC HOLDINGS, INC. AN UNKNOWN BUSINESS ENTITY D/B/A REUBEN'S MARC A/K/A VILLAGE BAR
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553 U.S.C.A. Cable Communications Policy Act
TUTORA v. MEISEL et al
as 5:2012cv02599
Plaintiff:
TOLEKSIS BIIN TUTORA
Defendant:
DALE MEISEL, CHRISTOPHER DAVIS, ROUGH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2011cv07239
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER DAVIS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, RIVERA, PISAREK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
DAVIS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2010cv06958
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER DAVIS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT, PISAREK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. MALITZKI et al
as 5:2009cv00739
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER DAVIS
Defendant:
STEPHEN B. MALITZKI, JR., BETHLEHEM TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT, BETHLEHEM TOWNSHIP and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Mecca v. Davis et al
as 3:2008cv00716
Plaintiff:
Constance Mecca and Constance Mecca
Defendant:
Christopher Davis, City of Scranton, David Elliott and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
R.D. v. Davis et al
as 3:2007cv01760
Plaintiff:
R.D.
Defendant:
Christopher Davis, David Elliott and The City of Scranton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
