Cases 1 - 10 of 780
Saquing v. Mallett et al
as 3:2020cv00182
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Ronald Ellzy Woodall, Wexler Medical and others
Plaintiff:
John Milton Saquing
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Williams et al
as 4:2018cv00229
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Pelicia Hall, Jerry Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Scooter Lynn Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
LaVan Yankton, Sr. v. Christopher Epps, et al
as 18-60240
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAVAN YANKTON, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER EPPS, EMMITT SPARKMAN, EARNEST LEE and others
Detrick Harris v. State of Mississippi, et al
as 17-60855
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DETRICK DEWAYNE HARRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, CHRISTOPHER EPPS, E. L. SPARKMAN and others
Robinson v. Hall et al
as 3:2017cv00807
Plaintiff:
Scooter Lynn Robinson
Defendant:
Pelicia Hall, Jerry Williams, Jacquelyn Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Logan v. Barbour et al
as 5:2017cv00119
Plaintiff:
Courtney R. Logan
Defendant:
Haley R. Barbour, Timothy H. Jones, Ricky L. Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. Lee et al
as 4:2017cv00102
Plaintiff:
Devin Bennett
Defendant:
Earnest Lee, Timothy Morris, Pelicia Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joe Amerson, Jr. v. Andrew Howorth, et al
as 16-60810
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOE LOUIS AMERSON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER EPPS, LAURA TILLEY, LATASHA CLAY and others
McGowan v. Epps et al
as 4:2016cv00242
Plaintiff:
Michael McGowan
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Emmitt L. Sparkman, Marshal Fisher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Faust v. Managment and Training Corp. et al
as 5:2016cv00072
Plaintiff:
Terry Faust
Defendant:
Managment and Training Corp., Wilkinson County Correctional Fac., Frank B. Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
