Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Johnson v. Lee et al
as 4:2016cv00044
Plaintiff:
Hakim Johnson
Defendant:
Earnest Lee, Christopher Epps, Wexford Health Sources, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ward v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2015cv00017
Plaintiff:
Evangaline Ward
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Corrections, Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Gloria M. Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor et al v. Epps et al
as 3:2014cv00352
Plaintiff:
Kenya Taylor , April Reed , Shenetta Draughn and others
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Johnnie Denmark, Andrease Buckner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Judd et al v. State of Mississippi et al
as 4:2014cv00009
Plaintiff:
James Arther Judd and Kevin Bowen
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, Mississippi Department of Corrections, Christopher Epps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Epps et al
as 3:2014cv00025
Plaintiff:
Deena Johnson
Defendant:
Christopher Epps , Earnest Lee , James Holman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burgess v. Reddix et al
as 4:2013cv00045
Plaintiff:
Mark Burgess
Defendant:
Michael Reddix , Carl Faulks , David Petrie and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Burgess v. Reddix et al
as 3:2013cv01006
Plaintiff:
Mark Burgess
Defendant:
Michael Reddix , Carl Faulks , David Petrie and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Winding v. Sanders et al
as 5:2012cv00088
Plaintiff:
James Winding
Defendant:
Lillie Blackmon Sanders , Adams County Jail , Craig Godbold and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Turner v. Epps et al
as 3:2012cv00064
Plaintiff:
Edwin Hart Turner
Defendant:
Christopher Epps and Emmitt L. Sparkman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2011cv00797
Plaintiff:
Pamela Smith
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Corrections, Christopher Epps, Lawrence Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
