Cases 1 - 10 of 381
Saquing v. Mallett et al
as 3:2020cv00182
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Ronald Ellzy Woodall, Wexler Medical and others
Plaintiff:
John Milton Saquing
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Hall et al
as 3:2017cv00807
Plaintiff:
Scooter Lynn Robinson
Defendant:
Pelicia Hall, Jerry Williams, Jacquelyn Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Logan v. Barbour et al
as 5:2017cv00119
Plaintiff:
Courtney R. Logan
Defendant:
Haley R. Barbour, Timothy H. Jones, Ricky L. Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. Lee et al
as 4:2017cv00102
Plaintiff:
Devin Bennett
Defendant:
Earnest Lee, Timothy Morris, Pelicia Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joe Amerson, Jr. v. Andrew Howorth, et al
as 16-60810
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOE LOUIS AMERSON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER EPPS, LAURA TILLEY, LATASHA CLAY and others
Faust v. Managment and Training Corp. et al
as 5:2016cv00072
Plaintiff:
Terry Faust
Defendant:
Managment and Training Corp., Wilkinson County Correctional Fac., Frank B. Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Fisher et al
as 1:2015cv00220
Plaintiff:
James Irvin Hill
Defendant:
Marshall Fisher, Jerry Williams, Raymond Byrd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnston v. Fisher et al
as 3:2015cv00486
Plaintiff:
Daniel Scott Johnston
Defendant:
Marshall Fisher, Christopher Epps, Jerry Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. MDOC Office of Medical Compliance et al
as 1:2015cv00203
Plaintiff:
Dennis O'Neal Lee
Defendant:
MDOC Office of Medical Compliance, Christopher Epps, Unknown Zin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Keefe Commissary Network et al
as 3:2015cv00335
Plaintiff:
Whitzey Santaiz Walker
Defendant:
Keefe Commissary Network, M.D.O.C., Christopher Epps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
