Cases 41 - 50 of 211
Torns v. State of Mississippi et al
as 3:2013cv00264
Plaintiff:
Romain Shontay Torns
Defendant:
State of Mississippi , Parole Board Chairmain, Board Members and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
States v. Epps
as 3:2013cv00226
Plaintiff:
Shawn M. States
Defendant:
Christopher Epps
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ingram v. State of Mississippi
as 4:2013cv00062
Plaintiff:
Christopher Ray Ingram
Defendant:
Christopher Epps and Johnny Crockett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wall v. Epps et al
as 3:2013cv00077
Petitioner:
Jerome Wall
Respondent:
Christopher Epps and E. L. Sparkman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Epps
as 4:2013cv00051
Plaintiff:
Derrick Williams
Defendant:
Christopher Epps
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Epps
as 3:2013cv01008
Plaintiff:
Derrick Williams
Defendant:
Christopher Epps
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Loucks v. Epps
as 1:2013cv00080
Plaintiff:
Nate Lee Loucks
Defendant:
Christopher Epps
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hughes v. Epps
as 3:2013cv00139
Petitioner:
Robert Earl Hughes
Respondent:
Christopher Epps
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Catchings v. Epps
as 3:2013cv00138
Plaintiff:
Cedric Catchings
Defendant:
Christopher Epps
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Richardson v. Epps et al
as 1:2013cv00044
Petitioner:
Michael Shane Richardson
Respondent:
Christopher Epps and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
