Cases 41 - 50 of 173
Edwards v. Lee et al
as 4:2013cv00112
Plaintiff:
Anthony J. Edwards
Defendant:
Earnest Lee, Pamela Robinson, Christopher Epps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Epps et al
as 4:2013cv00091
Plaintiff:
Bennie L. Williams
Defendant:
Christopher Epps and Emmitt L. Sparkman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jerome Wall v. David Walker, et al
as 13-60314
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEROME WALL
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID WALKER, CHRISTOPHER EPPS and RICHARD PENNINGTON
Moore v. Epps et al
as 1:2013cv00094
Plaintiff:
Richard Moore
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Mississippi Department of Corrections, Brand Huffman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dennis Lee v. Wexford Health Source, Inc., et al
as 13-60175
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENNIS O'NEAL LEE
Defendant - Appellee:
WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INCORPORATED, CHRISTOPHER EPPS, Individual and official capacity, E. L. SPARKMAN, Individual and official capacity and others
Bennie Ward v. Christopher Epps, et al
as 13-60152
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BENNIE WARD
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER EPPS, DOCTOR LORENZO CABE, LISA TUCKER and others
Andrews v. Davenport et al
as 4:2013cv00043
Plaintiff:
Kolby Andrews
Defendant:
Davenport, Rogers, Ron Reagon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dobbs v. Epps et al
as 4:2013cv00029
Plaintiff:
Carl Dobbs
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Emmitt L. Sparkman, Earnest Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Epps et al
as 4:2013cv00010
Plaintiff:
Charles Smith
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, E. L. Sparkman and Earnest Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henry v. Epps et al
as 4:2013cv00005
Petitioner:
Willie Lewis Henry, Jr.
Respondent:
Christopher Epps, Emmitt Sparkman, Ernest Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
