Cases 21 - 30 of 780
Walker v. Keefe Commissary Network et al
as 3:2015cv00335
Plaintiff:
Whitzey Santaiz Walker
Defendant:
Keefe Commissary Network, M.D.O.C., Christopher Epps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eric Jones v. E. Sparkman, et al
as 15-60266
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC DE'JUAN JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
E. L. SPARKMAN, UNKNOWN EMCF DISCIPLINARY RECORDS CUSTODIAN, UNKNOWN EMCF ERS OFFICER and others
Richard Simoneaux v. Christopher Epps, et al
as 15-60221
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD SIMONEAUX
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER EPPS, RONALD KING, HUBERT DAVIS and others
Henry Laneri, III v. Christopher Epps, et al
as 15-60197
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HENRY JOESPH LANERI, III
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER EPPS, Commissioner and LUCY C. MARTIN
Goree v. Howorth et al
as 3:2015cv00226
Plaintiff:
Tommy J. Goree
Defendant:
Andrew Howorth, Jim Hood, Larry E. Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Amerson v. Howorth et al
as 3:2015cv00225
Plaintiff:
Joe L. Amerson, Jr.
Defendant:
Andrew Howorth, Jim Hood, Larry E. Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stevens v. Howorth et al
as 3:2015cv00224
Plaintiff:
Tony Stevens
Defendant:
Andrew Howorth, Jim Hood, Larry E. Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stevens et al v. Amerson et al
as 3:2015cv00151
Plaintiff:
Tony Stevens, Joe L. Amerson, Jr. and Tommy J. Goree
Defendant:
Andrew Howorth, Jim Hood, Larry E. Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. Managment and Training Corporation et al
as 4:2015cv00022
Plaintiff:
Charles Delaine Coleman, Sr.
Defendant:
Managment and Training Corporation, Timothy Outlaw, Christopher Epps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI et al
as 3:2015cv00128
Plaintiff:
Kendrick M. Jones
Defendant:
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, Christopher Epps, Doris McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
